Perhaps because it involves so many nerds, the RPG community has a much tougher time than the sports community accepting really that sometimes people just suck and redesigning the game won't fix that.
Now--I've rarely seen a group with a decent interpersonal dynamic have a player who just sucked--even people who are dull shine up over time when surrounded by people of good will. Whether this is because interesting, smart people self-select or because an environment of cool, friendly people stimulates people to be better (or both) would be pure speculation on my part.
But there are lots of groups that aren't functional. Let's handle their FAQs.
But there are lots of groups that aren't functional. Let's handle their FAQs.
My friends won't role-play their characters and I need them to!!!
Then they are, at best, people you don't get on with and--at worst--super boring. Leave them and play with other people.
I like the other players but they won't do what I want to do!
Become more charismatic. Or if you can't: realize you never will and accept your limitations and relax a little because apparently you're stuck with them?
They won't read the book!
So? Reading the book is not and never should be essential. They have lives. That is good and probably makes them more interesting than you--a person who is complaining to internet strangers about your players' problems instead of talking to them. Maybe you're the boring one? Not everybody needs to read the book.
But maybe if I played a different game that supported role-playing?
If you need a game that gives you mechanical cookies to have a personality you are a boring person. You should become more interesting before you play any more games.
I dunno D&D seems to work against role-playing--in order to have a character whose personality reflects me I need to make choices that make the character suboptimal?
Then make the character suboptimal. I always do.
But if I play a suboptimal character, I'll die!
You should be able to run the table with a 2hp thief having never read the rules. If you can't then either:
-You are not good at imagining things and solving problems and need to become smarter. Because the game should be testing your ability to imagine things and solve problems.
or
-Your DM is not running the game in such a way that problem-solving imagination is rewarded in consistent and transparent ways and they suck at DMing and need to become smarter.
or
-Despite being so into playing your character you're willing to play a suboptimal build, your performance of that character isn't charming enough for the clever problem-solving characters to take pains to keep you around. Improve.
But there are games where I don't have to be smart or interesting!
Yes. And you can choose to play them--and find enough dumb, boring people to play with you (please don't inflict yourself on cool people)--then you can play them instead of becoming better as a person.
Are you saying everyone who plays games which don't require problem-solving and which have tools to help you roleplay more are only played by boring, stupid people?
No, I'm saying if, as an adult, you need them: you're a boring, stupid person.
That's very judgmental.
Yes. It's 2016: it should be painfully obvious that some people suck and that diagnosing that is an important life skill.
That's very judgmental.
Yes. It's 2016: it should be painfully obvious that some people suck and that diagnosing that is an important life skill.
Ok, so everyone I play with is terrible? What do I do?
This is not a problem any game design can fix. You need to go meet new people.
-
-
-











