tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2638993969706011706.post8259835709231589083..comments2024-02-29T00:47:06.191-08:00Comments on Playing D&D With Porn Stars: New Random Ranger For D&D and D&Dish GamesZak Sabbathhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08812410680077034917noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2638993969706011706.post-58056702066586712642013-06-20T01:24:50.943-07:002013-06-20T01:24:50.943-07:00I kind of want to try these out sometime; plus, I ...I kind of want to try these out sometime; plus, I think I'm going to watch some Monty Python, too.Ynas Midgardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14972628887096890642noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2638993969706011706.post-25467698472916447942012-06-11T09:13:19.423-07:002012-06-11T09:13:19.423-07:00i'd rather just have a few double results that...i'd rather just have a few double results that appear on both--my inner subgenre cop has never liked the "ok, ranger, have some druid spells" it seems lazy. Some of those are just druid-only things, y'know? plus some things seem like much more likely for a ranger than a druidZak Sabbathhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08812410680077034917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2638993969706011706.post-1767396074622815702012-06-11T08:17:54.832-07:002012-06-11T08:17:54.832-07:00I've never had a whole lot of interest in play...I've never had a whole lot of interest in playing a ranger until now.Seth S.https://www.blogger.com/profile/15420255267222005027noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2638993969706011706.post-72622225217405790042012-06-11T06:33:01.853-07:002012-06-11T06:33:01.853-07:00Having thought about it, maybe you could save effo...Having thought about it, maybe you could save effort by having a druid table and giving the ranger a chance to get a result on either the fighter or druid table. Similarly the paladin could use the fighter and cleric tables.anarchisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05546197561922726279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2638993969706011706.post-22205218980673344512012-06-10T09:40:40.024-07:002012-06-10T09:40:40.024-07:00The dual-wielding result is mechanically exactly t...The dual-wielding result is mechanically exactly the same as yesterday's warrior's 2-attacks-per-round result, so if it bothers you to call it "dual-wielding" you can call it "2 attacks per round". As for extra herbalism--I figured I'd save some stuff for the druid but if you like herby rangers, hey--go nutsZak Sabbathhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08812410680077034917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2638993969706011706.post-21714076059929169442012-06-10T09:11:21.751-07:002012-06-10T09:11:21.751-07:00PS Some more I mean.PS Some more I mean.anarchisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05546197561922726279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2638993969706011706.post-62228123258810128662012-06-10T09:10:12.632-07:002012-06-10T09:10:12.632-07:00Looks good, except that I'm pretty sure that R...Looks good, except that I'm pretty sure that Rangers' 'dual-wielding' ability is a pure D&Dism. Also maybe there could be some herbalism-based ability in there.anarchisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05546197561922726279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2638993969706011706.post-46281081013922822722012-06-09T19:53:47.808-07:002012-06-09T19:53:47.808-07:00Definitely stealing all this stuff :)Definitely stealing all this stuff :)Peter Fitzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17675284304482852740noreply@blogger.com